linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 May 2010 08:01:26 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok()

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 10:18 -0700, Yinghai wrote:
> > No. Both will hit 2.6.36. It's way too late to queue up such changes
> for
> > the 2.6.35 merge window which has already opened.
> 
> i have feeling that your new LMB code will hit 2.6.36. and
> x86 patches that is using to lmb will hit 2.6.37.
> 
> otherwise it will make more merge conflicts between tip and lmb.
> unless put your lmb change to tip?

There is no reason not to, I'll have them in a separate branch that Ingo
can pull. I think we can aim for 2.6.36 in one go provided that Peter
and Thomas are happy with the x86 side of things.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/