[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274133749.21352.756.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:02:29 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/35] lmb: prepare x86 to use lmb to replace early_res
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 01:09 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > No. That is not the point. Read the rest of my email !
> >
> > We need to -sanitize- those errors. _Maybe_ exposing LMB_ERROR is the
> > right way to do so, but in that case, we need to make -all- function use
> > the same error code. Right now, some fail with 0 and some with
> > LMB_ERROR.
> >
>
> Using errnos like the rest of the kernel seems like the right thing to
> do, IMO.
Maybe. The allocator/find functions return a physical address. If we all
agree that a physical address between -PAGE_SIZE and 0 is never valid,
then we can overlay the negative errno codes like we do for pointers.
I'll have a look at that, it shouldn't be very hard.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists