linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] trace: Common code for kprobes/uprobes traceevents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 11:51:42 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] trace: Common code for kprobes/uprobes
 traceevents

> 
> Isn't it a common header for kprobes and uprobes? :)
> 
> Maybe "Probe-based dynamic events common header" ?
> 

Agree.

> > +#define MAX_TRACE_ARGS 128
> > +#define MAX_ARGSTR_LEN 63
> > +#define MAX_EVENT_NAME_LEN 64
> > +#define UPROBE_EVENT_SYSTEM "uprobes"
> 
> You should *just move* the common code in this patch.
> Additional uprobes code can be introduced in next patch.
> 

Okay.

> > +
> > +/* Flags for trace_probe */
> > +#define TP_FLAG_TRACE	1
> > +#define TP_FLAG_PROFILE	2
> > +#define UPROBE_ENABLED	4
> 
> If this is a trace_probe flag, it is better to start with TP_FLAG_.

Okay.
Does TP_FLAG_UPROBE sound fine?


Thanks Masami.

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/