linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] v4 x86/mrst: add cpu type detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100519022335.00007d65@unknown>
Date:	Wed, 19 May 2010 02:23:35 -0700
From:	jacob pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Alek Du <alek.du@...el.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] v4 x86/mrst: add cpu type detection


>  Aside of that wouldn't it make more sense to do the chip
>  identification only once from mrst_init() and cache the result and
>  change mrst_identify_cpu()
>
the problem is again the ordering of cpuid, boot_cpu_data is not available
by the time we call  x86_mrst_early_setup(). I can move it to mrst_time_init()
but not very ideal. Unless we go back to do cpuid directly in the v1 patch :).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/