[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100520114218.GA15531@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:42:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Future tracing/instrumentation directions
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:31:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > - [ While it's still a long way off, if this trend continues
> > > we eventually might even be able to get rid of the
> > > /debug/tracing/ temporary debug API and get rid of
> > > the ugly in-kernel pretty-printing bits. This is
> > > good: it may make Andrew very happy for a change ;-)
> > >
> > > The main detail here to be careful of is that lots of
> > > people are fond of the simplicity of the
> > > /debug/tracing/ debug UI, so when we replace it we
> > > want to do it by keeping that simple workflow (or
> > > best by making it even simpler). I have a few ideas
> > > how to do this.
> >
> > How? We can emulate the /debug/tracing result with something
> > like perf trace, still that won't replace the immediate
> > availability of the result of any trace, which makes it
> > valuable for any simplest workflows.
>
> I'm a bit torn about this. I really like the availability of the ascii
> interface, but if we can come up with a very basic trace binary tool
> which can be built for deep embedded w/o requiring the world and some
> more libs to be available, then I might give up my resistance. Ideally
> it should be done so it can be easily integrated into busybox.
>
> I don't care whether I do
>
> echo 1 >/debug/..../XXX/enable
> cat /debug/tracing/trace
>
> or
>
> perfmini trace enable XXX
> perfmini trace dump
My suggestion for that flow is even shorter:
trace --enable XXX
trace
Plus:
trace --list
trace --enable
trace --disable
> as long as the tool is built in a way that it does not
> need updates when we add trace points or other
> functionality to the kernel.
Yeah, most definitely. The sysfs event_source class will
ensure that whatever (new) events are available propagate
through the tool and are available to it.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists