linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1274355346.2264.17.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 20 May 2010 19:35:45 +0800
From:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Autofs <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 13:04 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 12:03 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >>
> >> But it's not ... it is locked at that point.  It's not lock*ing*, but it
> >> is not *unlocked*, either.  Furthermore, it is directly contradicting
> >> the naming scheme of the ops structure.
> >>
> > 
> > Would you prefer me to resend a patch?
> > 
> 
> Yes, that would be my preference.
> 
> We really need to set a date to kill off autofs3 completely -- I don't
> care if we rename anything or not -- and add it to feature-removal.txt.

Yes, my bad.
I have to get onto that, sorry.

Ian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/