linux-kernel - Re: [patch] pipe: add support for shrinking and growing pipes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 May 2010 22:38:38 -0400
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [patch] pipe: add support for shrinking and growing pipes

On Sun, 23 May 2010 07:30:01 +0200 Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I see that this patch has hit Linus's git, so some questions
> 
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 May 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >>
> >> One issue I see is that it's possible to grow pipes indefinitely.
> >> Should this be restricted to privileged users?
> >
> > Yes. But perhaps only if it grows past the default (or perhaps "default*2"
> > or similar). That way a normal user could shrink the pipe buffers, and
> > then grow them again if he wants to.
> >
> > Oh, and I think you need to also require that there be at least two
> > buffers. Otherwise we can't guarantee POSIX behavior, I think.
> 
> Is there any documentation (e.g., a man-pages patch) for these changes?
> 
> The argument of the fcntl() operations is expressed in pages. I take
> it that this means that the semantics of the argument will very
> depending on the system page size? So for example, 2 on x86 will mean
> 8192 bytes, but will mean 32768 of ia64? That seems very weird. (And
> what about architectures where the page size is switchable?) Such
> changes in semantics should not be silent for the use, IMO.

Well, there is getpagesize().  But I agree - this interface is just
asking (x86) people to write non-portable code.

otoh, if the arg was in bytes, they'd just hard-code "8192".  They're
clever like that.

But we have gone to some lengths to avoid exposing things like
PAGE_SIZE and HZ in procfs, so it makes sense to take the same approach
to syscalls.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/