linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100523102024.GA20869@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 23 May 2010 12:20:24 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On 05/23/2010 11:13 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > ... which is then used for the concurrency-managed 
> > workqueue feature, which is then used for a BTRFS 
> > speedup, right?
> >
> > ( If that's not the plan then color me confused :)
> 
> Yeap, you're officially confused. :-) It doesn't have 
> much to do with btrfs at this point [...]

Not exclusive to btrfs of course, but IIRC one of the 
examples given in one of those threads was btrfs 
scalability, right?

In case it's not obvious, i'm trying to find a tangible 
improvement to examine. No need to resend stuff, do you 
have a link to that old performance measurement by any 
chance?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/