linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 May 2010 12:26:59 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq

Hello, Ingo.

On 05/23/2010 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Not exclusive to btrfs of course, but IIRC one of the examples given
> in one of those threads was btrfs scalability, right?

Hmmm... I don't think so.  If btrfs ever was mentioned, it must have
been pretty tangential.  Nothing rings a bell to me.

> In case it's not obvious, i'm trying to find a tangible improvement
> to examine. No need to resend stuff, do you have a link to that old
> performance measurement by any chance?

Sure.

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/939353

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/