linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BFE2C9D.6080909@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:05 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq

On 05/23/2010 12:26 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Ingo.
> 
> On 05/23/2010 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Not exclusive to btrfs of course, but IIRC one of the examples given
>> in one of those threads was btrfs scalability, right?
> 
> Hmmm... I don't think so.  If btrfs ever was mentioned, it must have
> been pretty tangential.  Nothing rings a bell to me.
> 
>> In case it's not obvious, i'm trying to find a tangible improvement
>> to examine. No need to resend stuff, do you have a link to that old
>> performance measurement by any chance?
> 
> Sure.
> 
>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/939353

Ingo, any update?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/