[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF9DE88.4060609@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:03:52 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: allow more page become unsync at gfn mapping
time
Avi Kivity wrote:
>> + if (need_unsync)
>> + kvm_unsync_pages(vcpu, gfn);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>
> Looks good, I'm just uncertain about role.invalid handling. What's the
> reasoning here?
>
Avi,
Thanks for your reply.
We no need worry about 'role.invalid' here, since we only allow the PTE shadow
pages(role.level == 1) become unsync, and in current code, 'role.invalid' is only
used for root shadow pages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists