[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF9E50B.6010205@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:31:39 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: MMU: allow more page become unsync at getting
sp time
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 03:16 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Allow more page become asynchronous at getting sp time, if need create
>> new
>> shadow page for gfn but it not allow unsync(level> 1), we should
>> unsync all
>> gfn's unsync page
>>
>>
>>
>> +/* @gfn should be write-protected at the call site */
>> +static void kvm_sync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
>> +{
>> + struct hlist_head *bucket;
>> + struct kvm_mmu_page *s;
>> + struct hlist_node *node, *n;
>> + unsigned index;
>> + bool flush = false;
>> +
>> + index = kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn);
>> + bucket =&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[index];
>> + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(s, node, n, bucket, hash_link) {
>>
>
> role.direct, role.invalid?
We only handle unsync pages here, and 'role.direct' or 'role.invalid'
pages can't become unsync.
>
> Well, role.direct cannot be unsync. But that's not something we want to
> rely on.
While we mark the unsync page, we have filtered out the 'role.direct' pages,
so, i think we not need worry 'role.direct' here. :-)
>
> This patch looks good too.
>
> Some completely unrelated ideas:
>
> - replace mmu_zap_page() calls in __kvm_sync_page() by setting
> role.invalid instead. This reduces problems with the hash list being
> modified while we manipulate it.
> - add a for_each_shadow_page_direct() { ... } and
> for_each_shadow_page_indirect() { ... } to replace the
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe()s.
Actually, i have introduced for_each_gfn_sp() to cleanup it in my private
development. :-)
> - add kvm_tlb_gather() to reduce IPIs from kvm_mmu_zap_page()
> - clear spte.accessed on speculative sptes (for example from invlpg) so
> the swapper won't keep them in ram unnecessarily
I also noticed this problem
>
> Again, completely unrelated to this patch set, just wrong them down so I
> don't forget them and to get your opinion.
>
Your ideas are very valuable, and i'll do those if you are not free :-)
Thanks,
Xiao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists