[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFBA0F8.9090908@example.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:05:44 +0200
From: Piotr Hosowicz <piotr@...owicz.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
icedove-bin/5449
On 25.05.2010 12:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 11:57 +0200, Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
>> On 25.05.2010 11:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> This doesnt fix the whole issue. cpu_clock() is local, while the measurements
>>> done in the blk code are global ...
>>>
>>> While the warning is fixed this way, the far more serious issue is still
>>> there: time can go backwards if two points of time measurement are on
>>> different CPUs and can mess up the statistics with negative values, etc...
>>
>> How serious is this? Can it damage my data? I ask because the machine is
>> my private computer, not any test machine.
>
> I'm not sure, since I didn't really look what they use the timestamps
> for, but a guess would say your data is safe, it might schedule the io
> funny, but it should not compromise integrity. At best its used purely
> for statistics and not even behaviour is affected.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Piotr Hosowicz
--
"Wiedza to władza. Ale niewiedza, niestety, nie oznacza jeszcze
braku władzy." Niels Bohr
NP: Black Stone Cherry - Reverend Wrinkle
NB: 2.6.34-20100524-1752
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists