[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525134453.GA4818@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 06:44:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: nanakos@...ed-net.gr
Cc: martyn.welch@...com, wfp5p@...ginia.edu,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: vme: vme.c: fixed an EXPORT_SYMBOL warning
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:09:17PM +0000, nanakos@...ed-net.gr wrote:
> From: Nanakos Chrysostomos <nanakos@...ed-net.gr>
>
> Fixed an EXPORT_SYMBOL warning.
What type of warning? a checkpatch.pl one? a gcc one? a sparse one?
Please be more verbose.
> Signed-off-by: Nanakos Chrysostomos <nanakos@...ed-net.gr>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vme/vme.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c b/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> index 093fbff..a0b63d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> @@ -1519,7 +1519,6 @@ struct bus_type vme_bus_type = {
> .probe = vme_bus_probe,
> .remove = vme_bus_remove,
> };
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_bus_type);
>
> static int __init vme_init(void)
> {
> @@ -1530,6 +1529,7 @@ static void __exit vme_exit(void)
> {
> bus_unregister(&vme_bus_type);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vme_bus_type);
This does not look correct, why move this away from where the structure
is defined?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists