[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261756000.23743@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:56:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_irqrestore
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Add a spin_unlock_irqrestore missing on the error path. Although the lock
is destroyed with the rest of the sachip structure in the function
__sa1111_remove, it still seems useful to restore the interrupt state.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@
* spin_lock_irqsave(E1,...);
<+... when != E1
if (...) {
... when != E1
* return ...;
}
...+>
* spin_unlock_irqrestore(E1,...);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
Perhaps the unlock is now too early?
arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
index a52a27c..59e38ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
*/
id = sa1111_readl(sachip->base + SA1111_SKID);
if ((id & SKID_ID_MASK) != SKID_SA1111_ID) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sachip->lock, flags);
__sa1111_remove(sachip);
platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
kfree(save);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists