[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261756150.23743@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:56:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/17] net/caif: Add missing spin_unlock
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path. The spin lock is used in a
balanced way elsewhere in the file.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@
* spin_lock(E1,...);
<+... when != E1
if (...) {
... when != E1
* return ...;
}
...+>
* spin_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
net/caif/cfmuxl.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/caif/cfmuxl.c b/net/caif/cfmuxl.c
index 7372f27..80c8d33 100644
--- a/net/caif/cfmuxl.c
+++ b/net/caif/cfmuxl.c
@@ -174,10 +174,11 @@ struct cflayer *cfmuxl_remove_uplayer(struct cflayer *layr, u8 id)
spin_lock(&muxl->receive_lock);
up = get_up(muxl, id);
if (up == NULL)
- return NULL;
+ goto out;
memset(muxl->up_cache, 0, sizeof(muxl->up_cache));
list_del(&up->node);
cfsrvl_put(up);
+out:
spin_unlock(&muxl->receive_lock);
return up;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists