[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261757050.23743@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:57:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Alex Elder <aelder@....com>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com,
xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/17] fs/xfs/quota: Add missing mutex_unlock
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Add a mutex_unlock missing on the error path. The use of this lock is
balanced elsewhere in the file.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@
* mutex_lock(E1,...);
<+... when != E1
if (...) {
... when != E1
* return ...;
}
...+>
* mutex_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
The use of ENOMEM rather than -ENOMEM is also a bit odd.
fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c
index 38e7641..2d8b7bc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c
@@ -249,8 +249,10 @@ xfs_qm_hold_quotafs_ref(
if (!xfs_Gqm) {
xfs_Gqm = xfs_Gqm_init();
- if (!xfs_Gqm)
+ if (!xfs_Gqm) {
+ mutex_unlock(&xfs_Gqm_lock);
return ENOMEM;
+ }
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists