[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFE1BD7.2090702@monstr.eu>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:14:31 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michal.simek@...alogix.com,
arnd@...db.de, john.williams@...alogix.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peter.fritzsche@....de, anton@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: Use raw_local_irq_save/restore instead local_irq_save/restore
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> If a developer looks at atomic_add_return() and asks himself "why did
>> this use raw_local_irq_save()", the only way of answering that question
>> is to go groveling through the git logs, which is a right PITA if
>> you're trying to get some coding work done.
>>
>> Guys, any time you add code which is non-obvious at the raw C level, it
>> *needs* a comment!
>
> Totally agree! I've gotten pretty good at adding comments to changes
> like this that I do. I need to get better at telling others to comment
> their work ;-)
ok. Will add any sensible comment.
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists