[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527111136.GV3266@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:11:36 +0200
From: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression E1;
> @@
>
> * spin_lock(E1,...);
> <+... when != E1
> if (...) {
> ... when != E1
> * return ...;
> }
> ...+>
> * spin_unlock(E1,...);
> // </smpl>
Btw, I think it would be great to have a collection of these semantic
match scripts in the kernel repository together with a build target to
run these scripts over the kernel sources (like the cscope target).
Opinions?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists