[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005271317180.5422@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:17:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Palix <npalix@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression E1;
> > @@
> >
> > * spin_lock(E1,...);
> > <+... when != E1
> > if (...) {
> > ... when != E1
> > * return ...;
> > }
> > ...+>
> > * spin_unlock(E1,...);
> > // </smpl>
>
> Btw, I think it would be great to have a collection of these semantic
> match scripts in the kernel repository together with a build target to
> run these scripts over the kernel sources (like the cscope target).
> Opinions?
We have submitted and received some feedback on an initial version of
this, but I'm not completely sure of the current status.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists