[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525215552.GA12633@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:55:52 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext3 tree with Linus' tree
Hi Stephen,
On Sat 22-05-10 15:45:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the ext3 tree got a conflict in fs/super.c
> between commits b20bd1a5e78af267dc4b6e1ffed48d5d776302c5 ("get rid of
> S_BIAS"), 1712ac8fda7d8bc4dc921f5777b7423aacad7263 ("Saner locking around
> deactivate_super()") and e1e46bf1866317d4f86f66bf18d3f07317d9f9ee ("Trim
> includes in fs/super.c") from Linus' tree and commits
> c3134141c78d5ea233a08b703b553e70cfb5c585 ("quota: move unmount handling
> into the filesystem") and cdb89ca659f5a39edf88f3c55e545ea3347533d1
> ("quota: explicitly set ->dq_op and ->s_qcop") from the ext3 tree.
Thanks! I've now rebased for_next branch on recent Linus's tree and
so this conflict should go away.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists