[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527223512.GA11364@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:35:12 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:32:47PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The kernel performs no explicit notification to userspace. With legacy
>
> For a PC ACPI using type device /proc/acpi/events which wakes acpid which
> wakes gnome-power-manager which wakes half the universe
No, there's no explicit /proc/acpi/event notification on resume.
> Do we need a better more generic version of the events files - maybe but
> thats a rather different kettle of fish to suspend blockers.
It's a requirement for any reasonable alternative approach.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists