[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527223605.GB11364@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:36:05 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:23:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:49 +0100
> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > This is I believe robust (and has been implemented on some non x86
> > > boxes). It depends on not forcing running tasks into suspend. That is the
> > > key.
> >
> > We've already established that ACPI systems require us to force running
> > tasks into suspend. How do we avoid the race in that situation?
>
> Android phones do not have ACPI. Embedded platforms do not have ACPI. MID
> x86 devices do not have ACPI.
It doesn't matter. Right now there's a race condition in terms of
wakeup events on ACPI systems. What's your proposal for fixing that?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists