[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275040988.20005.29.camel@thorin>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:03:08 +0200
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Don, 2010-05-27 at 22:28 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:24:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > Would it help to divide the application into two processes, one of
> > which receives events and the other does the drawing?
>
> At the point where you're rewriting the application you can just make it
> adhere to our current behavioural standards anyway.
Thank you for confirming that the so-called "feature" is just there to
make apps work in some area that are crappy anyways - and God knows in
which other areas they are crappy too.
SCNR,
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists