| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1275067652.4507.192.camel@localhost> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:27:32 -0700 From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>, Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Len@...p1.linux-foundation.org" <Len@...p1.linux-foundation.org>, "linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 8/8] intel_idle: create a native cpuidle driver for select intel processors On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 20:14 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:00 +0300 > Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > ext Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > it's really inconvenient to have such drivers hidden in the > > > architecture code; it's much more convenient for cpuidle developers > > > if they're all in one place. > > > > > > > why? > > because you have all the users of your API in one place. > That's a rather x86-centric definition of "all". Are you suggesting we move all the embedded SoC specific CPUidle drivers to drivers/idle as well? Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists