lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275067710.4507.194.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 28 May 2010 10:28:30 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] intel_idle: create a native cpuidle driver for
 select intel processors

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 20:22 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > >> >  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c       |  446
> 
> > >> Any reason this arch-specific driver needs to be in drivers/idle
> > >> instead of under a platform specific dir like arch/x86?
> 
> > To me that would be much less convenient as I expect to maintain my
> > platform-specific CPUidle driver along with the rest of my
> > platform-specific code.
> 
> I guess the reason is conveneince of the maintainer (me).

OK, fair enough.

At least that makes more sense to me than "keeping all users in one
place."

Kevin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ