[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100528122811.3ff8decc@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:28:11 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Mike Habeck <habeck@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] x86 pci: Add option to not assign BAR's if not
already assigned
On Fri, 28 May 2010 10:10:16 -0700
Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 05/28/2010 09:53 AM, Mike Travis wrote:
> >> Any further consideration for this patch, or has it been rejected?
> >
> > Well, it's really up to Jesse, but as far as I can see, this patch is a
> > net loss of functionality and doesn't actually add anything. Without
> > this patch, some resources that were not assigned by BIOS will be
> > unreachable. With this patch, *all* resources that were not assigned by
> > BIOS will be unreachable...
> >
> > -hpa
> >
>
> Apparently you're missing the point of the patch? The patch is needed
> because BIOS is purposely not assigning I/O BAR's to devices that won't
> use them, freeing up the resource for devices that do need them. Where
> is the "all" resources that are not reachable?
Applied to my linux-next branch, thanks.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists