lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100528114539.012ff1d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 28 May 2010 11:45:39 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

Hi Al,

After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c:1852: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'int'
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c:1871: error: 'spufs_mfc_fsync' undeclared here (not in a function)

Caused by commit 05b2fc7d1f1046fef1199e1a4d2f63df998ef3aa ("drop unused
dentry argument to ->fsync").

My merge of the vfs tree was also bad because commit
facd07b07d2a7988f5ce849558838cc953847637 ("direct-io: add a hook for the
fs to provide its own submit_bio function") that entered Linus' tree in
the past 24 hours changed the prototype of __blockdev_direct_IO() and
that probably needs reflecting in the new __blockdev_direct_IO_newtrunc().

I have used the vfs tree from next-20100527 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ