[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100528015145.GI31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:51:45 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:45:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c:1852: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'int'
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c:1871: error: 'spufs_mfc_fsync' undeclared here (not in a function)
Tpyo in fsync patch (missing comma in line 1852 there)
> Caused by commit 05b2fc7d1f1046fef1199e1a4d2f63df998ef3aa ("drop unused
> dentry argument to ->fsync").
> My merge of the vfs tree was also bad because commit
> facd07b07d2a7988f5ce849558838cc953847637 ("direct-io: add a hook for the
> fs to provide its own submit_bio function") that entered Linus' tree in
> the past 24 hours changed the prototype of __blockdev_direct_IO() and
> that probably needs reflecting in the new __blockdev_direct_IO_newtrunc().
OK, I'll rebase that stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists