[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinwjNpAg6y3n1ZzAtPIv-sJE_P7WjbzzrRRCBVD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 21:33:02 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit()
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> ok, can you sincerely tell me that your change makes the code more
> readable? And have you checked to see what the compiler actually
> "optimizes"?
>
> original code:
>
> movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp65
> movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, tmp64
> cmpl $1, %edi #, rw
> cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp65,, tmp64
> movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # tmp64, <variable>.bi_end_io
> .loc 1 91 0
> call submit_bio #
>
> your change:
>
> movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp63
> movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, iftmp.561
> cmpl $1, %edi #, rw
> cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp63,, iftmp.561
> movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # iftmp.561, <variable>.bi_end_io
> .loc 1 90 0
> call submit_bio #
>
> so that change does nothing except obfuscating the source a bit more so
> that you get more headaches whenever you look at it.
>
Oh, I didn't check the asm code. Compiler is smarter than I thought.
Thanks for your explaining.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists