[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTil-BYnf3swXPj_Llm-XpTks9-NKEi8fgq07JFV3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 10:39:02 +0200
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linux@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
2010/5/28 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> Ok lets try and produce something more concrete. The control groups may
> be the wrong tool but we've got several such tools already
>
>
> Kernel involved
> ----------------
> acquire: mark myself important (into cgroup important)
> acquire(timeout) ditto, plus app timer/timeout handler
> release: mark myself unimportant (into cgroup downtrodden)
May we somehow live without acquire(timeout)? This is the feature that
can screw up a lot of things with very complicated debugging options.
~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists