[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKI1G9qEKwpMOFvoWa5Qa__GcXGooE2_ZfmEHx@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 10:43:53 +0200
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...ia.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com> wrote:
> I am quite willing to state that on both MSM and OMAP based Android
> platforms, we've found that the suspend blocker model allows us to
> obtain a lower average power draw than if we don't use it -- Mike Chan
> provided some numbers earlier in another thread in the trivial device
> idle case, the win is of course much larger in the case of several
> poorly behaved apps being active.
Without the clear description of the experiments, that statement
proves just nothing other than your applications work better with your
model, but I would expect that to be so without any experiments at
all.
~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists