lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 29 May 2010 10:43:53 +0200
From:	Vitaly Wool <>
To:	Brian Swetland <>
Cc:	Igor Stoppa <>,
	"" <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	"Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <>,
	LKML <>,
	Florian Mickler <>,
	Linux PM <>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Alan Cox <>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Brian Swetland <> wrote:
> I am quite willing to state that on both MSM and OMAP based Android
> platforms, we've found that the suspend blocker model allows us to
> obtain a lower average power draw than if we don't use it -- Mike Chan
> provided some numbers earlier in another thread in the trivial device
> idle case, the win is of course much larger in the case of several
> poorly behaved apps being active.

Without the clear description of the experiments, that statement
proves just nothing other than your applications work better with your
model, but I would expect that to be so without any experiments at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists