[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C026497.8070901@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 16:13:59 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Tom Lyon <pugs@...co.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, joro@...tes.org,
hjk@...utronix.de, gregkh@...e.de, aafabbri@...co.com,
scofeldm@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFIO driver: Non-privileged user level PCI drivers
On 05/30/2010 04:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>
>>>>> IMO this was because this driver does two things: programming iommu and
>>>>> handling interrupts. uio does interrupt handling.
>>>>> We could have moved iommu / DMA programming to
>>>>> a separate driver, and have uio work with it.
>>>>> This would solve limitation of the current driver
>>>>> that is needs an iommu domain per device.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> How do we enforce security then? We need to ensure that unprivileged
>>>> users can only use the device with an iommu.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Force assigning to iommu before we allow any other operation?
>>>
>>>
>> That means the driver must be aware of the iommu.
>>
> The userspace driver? Yes. And It is a good thing to be explicit
> there anyway, since this lets userspace map a non-contigious
> virtual address list into a contiguous bus address range.
>
No, the kernel driver. It cannot allow userspace to enable bus
mastering unless it knows the iommu is enabled for the device and remaps
dma to user pages.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists