[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100530145309.GO27611@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 17:53:09 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Tom Lyon <pugs@...co.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, joro@...tes.org,
hjk@...utronix.de, gregkh@...e.de, aafabbri@...co.com,
scofeldm@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFIO driver: Non-privileged user level PCI drivers
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:13:59PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 04:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>> IMO this was because this driver does two things: programming iommu and
>>>>>> handling interrupts. uio does interrupt handling.
>>>>>> We could have moved iommu / DMA programming to
>>>>>> a separate driver, and have uio work with it.
>>>>>> This would solve limitation of the current driver
>>>>>> that is needs an iommu domain per device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> How do we enforce security then? We need to ensure that unprivileged
>>>>> users can only use the device with an iommu.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Force assigning to iommu before we allow any other operation?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That means the driver must be aware of the iommu.
>>>
>> The userspace driver? Yes. And It is a good thing to be explicit
>> there anyway, since this lets userspace map a non-contigious
>> virtual address list into a contiguous bus address range.
>>
>
> No, the kernel driver. It cannot allow userspace to enable bus
> mastering unless it knows the iommu is enabled for the device and remaps
> dma to user pages.
So what I suggested is failing any kind of access until iommu
is assigned.
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists