linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 20:55:50 +0200
From:	Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	agk@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs

On 05/31/2010 08:27 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:

>>> AES-NI is not asynchronous and doesn't have limited resources.
>>
>> AES-NI used asynchronous crypto interface, was using asynchronous
>> crypto API cryptd daemon IIRC. So this changed?
> 
> AFAIK all ciphers use the asynchronous interface,  but that 
> doesn't mean they are actually asynchronous. AES-NI certainly
> does not require running in a special thread. The only
> thing it doesn't support is running from interrupt context.

I mean how it is implemented now in crypto API, and I was almost
sure that aes-ni acceleration code uses cryptd (iow real asynchronous processing)
and also that not all CPU cores can run these instruction in parallel.

So I am mistaken here?

Milan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/