[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100602085254.778aaf31.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 08:52:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
tglx@...utronix.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, sparse@...isli.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] rcu: finalize debugobjects, first round of RCU
sparse pointer checks
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:34:41 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Hello, Ingo,
> >
> > Here are the final commits from Mathieu's debugobjects series and the
> > first few from Arnd's RCU-pointer sparse series. The first three remove
> > RCU's (useless) initializations from mm, fs, and powerpc:
> >
> > mm: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/18/562
> > fs: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/18/500
> > powerpc:http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg43510.html
> >
> > Kosaki Motohiro agreed that the mm patch should go up -tip, and none of
> > the other maintainers objected to the prospect of their patches going
> > up -tip.
>
> Andrew, can we hear your opinion? I think this patch series have some
> dependencies, then -tip is best place. If any code confliction occur,
> I promise I'll solve it soon.
>
A wee little two-line patch? Go wild!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists