[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100603125804.7245.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:58:26 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, sparse@...isli.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] rcu: finalize debugobjects, first round of RCU sparse pointer checks
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:34:41 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hello, Ingo,
> > >
> > > Here are the final commits from Mathieu's debugobjects series and the
> > > first few from Arnd's RCU-pointer sparse series. The first three remove
> > > RCU's (useless) initializations from mm, fs, and powerpc:
> > >
> > > mm: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/18/562
> > > fs: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/18/500
> > > powerpc:http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg43510.html
> > >
> > > Kosaki Motohiro agreed that the mm patch should go up -tip, and none of
> > > the other maintainers objected to the prospect of their patches going
> > > up -tip.
> >
> > Andrew, can we hear your opinion? I think this patch series have some
> > dependencies, then -tip is best place. If any code confliction occur,
> > I promise I'll solve it soon.
> >
>
> A wee little two-line patch? Go wild!
Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists