[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100603122309.GJ2698@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:23:09 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-serial/ftdi_sio: fix DTR/RTS line modes
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:55:02 +0200
> Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de> wrote:
>
> > Call set_mctrl() and clear_mctrl() according to the flow control mode
> > selected. This makes serial communication for FT232 connected devices
> > work when CRTSCTS is not set.
> >
> > This fixes a regression introduced by 4175f3e31 ("tty_port: If we are
> > opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier"). This patch
> > calls the low-level driver's dtr_rts() function which consequently
> > sets TIOCM_DTR | TIOCM_RTS. A later call to set_termios() without
> > CRTSCTS in cflags, however, does not reset these bits, and so data is
> > not actually sent out on the serial wire.
>
> If you've got hardware the other end expecting RTS/CTS signals you
> really ought to set CRTSCTS.
I know. It is, however, a regression in my case, and there might be
other cases where RTS/CTS aren't connected at all. The core of the
problem is that the driver sets hardware flow control, even though the
userspace asked for not doing that.
> However you patch makes complete sense in
> terms of which way it is best to end up.
And it shouldn't break anything I'd say.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists