lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:40:55 -0400
From:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: modules: remove -w option (ie. !O_NONBLOCK)?

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 22:55 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:

>    Since waiting module removal was never implemented in modprobe, I wonder
> if we should simply get rid of it?  (It's implemented in rmmod only).
> Unused code is buggy code, and there doesn't seem to be a demand for removing
> modules "at some time in the future".
> 
> Thoughts?

I'll think some more after coffee this morning but my first instinct is
"sure, few people care about module removal anyway any more" :)

Jon.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ