[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100603192626.GA20790@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 04:26:27 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:21:59AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > I don't see how we can do without defconfigs altogether tho. I mean , if
> > you want to run a Beagle board or a Nexus one we can't just give the
> > users a slim ARM config and let them troll through 1000's of drivers
> > trying to find just those ones that work on their given board.
>
> Well, you also don't need the full defconfig's with the kernel.
>
That's true. We already have things like KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG for these
purposes, and that's primarily what I use for buildig bootable
randconfigs for specific board/CPU combinations on SH.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists