[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275593742.23384.48.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:35:42 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 11:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > No amount of reorganising the Kconfig files into a heirarchial manner
> > (which they already are) helps. Not one bit. Because they already are.
> > That's not where the problem is.
>
> I don't think you read the whole thread.
>
> Earlier on, I explained exactly what I wanted: just add some "select"
> statements to pickt he things you need per the particular target
> configuration. You seem to have missed that part.
>
> In other words, you _can_ encode the information that is in the
> xyz_defconfig files by doing it in Kconfig.xyz files instead. But you do
> it in a human-readable manner. And the hierarchical thing is absolutely
> required for that - otherwise you'd end up with just another form of the
> current xyz_defconfig.
>
> See?
>
> In other words, you should be able to basically use "make allnoconfig"
> together with a Kconfig.xyz file input to select _exactly_ the pieces you
> need, and nothing else.
If you did this for drivers, what about disabling a driver? If we used
"select" wouldn't that force all the drivers on without allowing it to
be unselected?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists