[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006031455280.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: floppy driver assumes INITIAL_JIFFIES == 0
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> It seems it isn't related to initial jiffies.
> Initializing the values (though a good idea), doesn't solve the
> problem. Still failed. So dazed and confused, went back and reran
> kernel with jiffies=0 showed same problem, just took multiple boots
> to reproduce.
Ahh, ok. That really ends up limiting us. At least having a "it's related
to jiffy wraparound" was a big clue.
> So still a race that shows up with KVM (fast floppy?) and manifests
> as floppy_ready or reset_interrupt OOPS.
Yes, it's quite possible that the Linux floppy driver is simply broken by
any floppy device that basically responds immediately to a command with an
interrupt. And considering how few people use floppies, I do expect that
driver to get _worse_ rather than better in the future.
Don't get me wrong - I'm sure it could be fixed. I'm just not sure that
anybody is going to spend the effort.
I'd love to be proven wrong. Anybody?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists