[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100607175604.4c8f1fa4@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:56:04 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
<tytso@....edu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 20:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> And since Android can reach essentially the same low-power
> state from idle as from suspend, it appears that they really don't need
> any kernel changes at all.
Well, perhaps a hint to the scheduler to fall through as fast as
possible into deepest idle?
>
> Alan Stern
>
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists