linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - net/mac80211/sta_info.c:125 invoked rcu_dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100607235941.GD2387@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:59:42 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nauman@...gle.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - net/mac80211/sta_info.c:125 invoked
 rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:25:44PM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> [   43.478812] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [   43.478815] ---------------------------------------------------
> [   43.478820] net/mac80211/sta_info.c:125 invoked
> rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> [   43.478824]
> [   43.478824] other info that might help us debug this:
> [   43.478826]
> [   43.478829]
> [   43.478830] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> [   43.478834] no locks held by NetworkManager/4017.

Hmmm...  Johannes's update has been merged, and it requires that callers
either be in an RCU read-side critical section or hold either the
->sta_lock or the ->sta_mtx, and this thread does none of this.

Johannes, any thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul

> [   43.478837] stack backtrace:
> [   43.478842] Pid: 4017, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 2.6.35-rc2-git1 #8
> [   43.478846] Call Trace:
> [   43.478849]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81064e9c>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
> [   43.478876]  [<ffffffffa010cb3c>] sta_info_get_bss+0x71/0x12d [mac80211]
> [   43.478889]  [<ffffffffa010cc0d>] ieee80211_find_sta+0x15/0x2f [mac80211]
> [   43.478902]  [<ffffffffa019ae16>] iwlagn_tx_queue_reclaim+0xe7/0x1bb [iwlagn]
> [   43.478909]  [<ffffffff8106530b>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x262
> [   43.478920]  [<ffffffffa019e270>] iwlagn_rx_reply_tx+0x4cd/0x58a [iwlagn]
> [   43.478928]  [<ffffffff811ca313>] ? is_swiotlb_buffer+0x2e/0x3b
> [   43.478937]  [<ffffffffa0192ec2>] iwl_rx_handle+0x161/0x2bf [iwlagn]
> [   43.478946]  [<ffffffffa019370a>] iwl_irq_tasklet+0x2eb/0x408 [iwlagn]
> [   43.478953]  [<ffffffff8103f892>] tasklet_action+0xa7/0x10f
> [   43.478960]  [<ffffffff810404cf>] __do_softirq+0x148/0x25a
> [   43.478966]  [<ffffffff8100314c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> [   43.478972]  [<ffffffff81004d20>] do_softirq+0x38/0x80
> [   43.478977]  [<ffffffff8103ffd0>] irq_exit+0x45/0x94
> [   43.478983]  [<ffffffff81004465>] do_IRQ+0xad/0xc4
> [   43.478989]  [<ffffffff813ca3d3>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
> [   43.478993]  <EOI>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/