[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100609223249.AC8204B2CC@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 011/100] eclone (11/11): Document sys_eclone
> Peter, Arnd, Roland - do you have any concerns with requiring all
> architectures to specify the stack to eclone() as [base, offset]
I can't see why that would be a problem.
It's consistent with the sigaltstack interface we already have.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists