[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006101115.51073.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:15:50 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
hpa@...or.com, roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 011/100] eclone (11/11): Document sys_eclone
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Albert and Randy point out that this would require #ifdefs in the
> application code that intends to be portable across say IA64 and x86.
>
> Can we instead have all architectures specify [base, size] ?
No objections from me on that.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists