linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C108587.6070409@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:26:15 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com,
	bharrosh@...asas.com, bp@...en8.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	toralf.foerster@....de, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

On 06/09/2010 10:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 00:43, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Note: I have applied this  because it fixes a regression, but it bugs
> 
> You seem to have pushed the wrong one, from this/the old thread (new one has
> `resent' in the subject)?
> 

I tried to make sure I wouldn't get bad metadata, and found that the
newer patch was supposedly marked "doesn't work".

If it was a build dependency issue that is one thing.  I'll replace the
patch tomorrow.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/