[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100610062618.GA20062@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:26:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf events finer grained context instrumentation /
context exclusion
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Here is the new version of per context exclusion, based on hooks on
> irq_enter/irq_exit. I haven't observed slowdowns but I haven't actually
> measured the impact.
One thing that would be nice to see in this discussion is a comparison of
before/after perf stat --repeat runs.
Something like:
perf stat --repeat ./hackbench 5
Done with full stat, and then also done with hardirqs/softirqs excluded. (i.e.
task context stats only)
I.e. does the feature really give us the expected statistical stability in
results? Does it really exclude hardirq/softirq workloads, etc.?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists