[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100610120608.GB16514@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:06:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf: Provide a proper stop action for software
events
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Something like the below would work, the only 'problem' is that it grows
> hw_perf_event.
> @@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
> struct { /* software */
> s64 remaining;
> struct hrtimer hrtimer;
> + int stopped;
IMO that's ok.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists