lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:06:18 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [10/23] SCHED: Only allocate per cpu cpu mask buffer with offstack cpumasks

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:

> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 16:52 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > This patch will actually break things.. please read the code.
>> > 
>> > I guess we could move the unsigned long into that block, but I really
>> > don't see the point.
>> 
>> How does it break things? 
>> 
>> ptr is not used for anything unless that define is set. gcc doesn't
>> lie on this.

Ok.

For the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED || !CPUMASK_OFFSTACK case it's still wasted
memory because it is not used for anything. If you enable the kmemleak
tracer you should also get a warning about this

I updated the patch with a better ifdef to have CONFIG_UNFAIR_GROUP_SCHED
too.

-Andi

---

SCHED: Only allocate per cpu cpu mask buffer with offstack cpumasks v2

This will save a few bytes in the non offstack cpumask case.

Found by gcc 4.6's new warnings.

Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

---
 kernel/sched.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.35-rc2-gcc/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35-rc2-gcc.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6.35-rc2-gcc/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7482,7 +7482,7 @@ static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task
 void __init sched_init(void)
 {
 	int i, j;
-	unsigned long alloc_size = 0, ptr;
+	unsigned long alloc_size = 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 	alloc_size += 2 * nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **);
@@ -7494,7 +7494,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	alloc_size += num_possible_cpus() * cpumask_size();
 #endif
 	if (alloc_size) {
+#if defined(CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK) || defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED)
+		unsigned long ptr;
 		ptr = (unsigned long)kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_NOWAIT);
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 		init_task_group.se = (struct sched_entity **)ptr;


-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ